Type something and hit enter

ads here
Home invest in investing living frugal what to invest in This Investopedia article makes the case that mutual funds are a better choice than ETF's unless you have around $60,000 to invest. Is this true?

This Investopedia article makes the case that mutual funds are a better choice than ETF's unless you have around $60,000 to invest. Is this true?

On
advertise here

I've been interested in starting my investing journey by opening a brokerage account and either using mutual funds or ETF's. My research lead me to this Investopedia article that stated that mutual funds were a better choice unless you could invest around $60000 into ETF's for one year, or $13,000 for ten years. Is this true?

http://ift.tt/1m94iOL



Submitted March 04, 2017 at 04:14AM by TimeTravelingGroot http://ift.tt/2mXPiKf
invest ininvestingliving frugalwhat to invest in
advertise here

Click to comment
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)