Everyone is different. Lately I have seen all of these people bashing dollar cost averaging and running the numbers on lump sum investing and getting into the exact numbers of every single possibility. I've read the threads on Bogleheads during the 2008 crashes, etc. Many of us are still too young to realize how we will truly act when a crash like that happens again. Would the difference over 20 years not be negligible when Lump sum investing versus dollar cost averaging? Many people are actually worried about the worst case scenarios, rather than the averages.
Submitted September 21, 2017 at 10:32AM by tellykent http://ift.tt/2xq2ijS
