It seems kind of pointless, especially if the goal of the bank is maximum profit and minimum expenses. Are the reasons that banks find value in having such a large workforce when passive investments require little overhead and also have consistent returns? especially with the dying demand for privately managed funds, most of the superrich potential clients have their wealth tied to their own companies as well
---ignore---
I dont have much more to add to the most myself but there is a minimum character limit on this sub so I have to have extra content written down here just so that the bot does not auto-remove the post.
Submitted September 06, 2021 at 11:50AM by Surprisinglysound https://ift.tt/2WZMlR5
