Most tech savy reviewers say that they scored really low compared to even the cheap $100 purifiers on amazon. The part that makes me confused is that Dyson says the current testing method is outdated and that a high CADR (Clean air delivery rate) is useless in real world application. Can someone explain to me how a purifier with a low CADR can actually clean a room better than a purifier with a high CADR? Its my understanding that these reviewers believe Dyson purifiers aren't sucking in enough air which means most of the air being blown around isn't getting purified. How does Dyson's newer testing standard negate this? Is it that the Dyson takes a bit longer but in the end they collect the most pollution? If that's the case then I will put one in my cart right now lol!
Submitted April 29, 2020 at 09:19PM by blackpino https://ift.tt/35jxFvG
