If you compare the graphs of the Vanguard LifeStrategy funds, it's clear that--at least in the available range--the high-risk high-reward "Growth" flavor has done no better than the low-risk low-reward "Income" version. In fact, the only discernible difference appears to be that "Income" doesn't crash as hard.
Obviously I'm missing something, as I assume that the dichotomy is usually "low risk low reward" versus "high risk high reward" rather than "low risk low reward" / "high risk same reward".
Can someone explain it to me?
Submitted April 08, 2017 at 03:58PM by PURELY_TO_VOTE http://ift.tt/2nsblh4
